01568nas a2200217   4500008004100000245013500041210006900176260001200245300000900257520082200266653001101088653002001099653002301119653001101142653003301153653002501186100001801211700001801229700002301247856008001270       2021                        eng d00aSpatial Distribution of JESSICA  Funding Across Polish Municipalities. Perspective of Territorial Dimension  of EU Cohesion Policy0 aSpatial Distribution of JESSICA Funding Across Polish Municipali  c10/2021  a7-203 aThe JESSICA initiative was set up to provide a more sustainable and efficient response to the needs of urban areas, as compared to non-repayable grants. Anchored in the literature on place-based policy and territorial cohesion, this paper addresses the question how the JESSICA funds were allocated among Polish cities – whether, intuitively, only to key urban centres, or to smaller cities as well. The results illustrate that the repayable assistance of JESSICA was dispersed throughout the regions, although the degree of dispersion remains mixed across them. Almost half of the JESSICA funds was transferred to small and medium-sized cities. It was also found that the bulk of the assistance went to the projects that were implemented in cities situated within metropolitan areas of the regional capital cities.10acities10acohesion policy10aJESSICA initiative10aPoland10astandard deviational ellipse10aterritorial cohesion1 aIdczak, Piotr1 aMrozik, Karol1 aMusiałkowska, Ida  uhttps://studreg.uw.edu.pl/dane/web_sril_files/1746/2021_3_idczak_mrozik.pdf02910nam a2200241   4500008004100000022002200041245012700063210006900190260003000259300000800289520211700297653003102414653002002445653001602465653001302481653001902494653001702513653002002530100002302550700001802573700001702591856006002608       2020                        eng d  a978-83-957204-4-400aSuccesses & Failures in EU Cohesion Policy: An Introduction to EU cohesion policy in Eastern, Central, and Southern Europe0 aSuccesses Failures in EU Cohesion Policy An Introduction to EU c  aBerlin/WarsawbDe Gruyter  a2083 aRegions in the EU’s Eastern and Southern peripheries tend to perform badly across many rankings from economic development, to quality of government,social justice and innovation potential, despite the fact that the vast majorityof EU structural funding has been spent in these countries. However, these countries followed different development trajectories and reacted differently to the economic crisis. Some of them still struggle, others thrive, others, afteryears of structural transformation, are stuck in a middle-income trap.Successes and failures as a result of EU cohesion implementation are avaluable source of feedback for future plans. Southern part of the EU, and Central and Eastern Europe provide an excellent opportunity to evaluatethem, The whole implementation exercise is sometimes challenging to accomplish, as both the public and private sectors have low absorption capacity. In contrast, positive experiences also emerged. Regions in Central and Eastern European countries witnessed improvements in the form of change in GDP per capita, benchmarked against the EU average during theyears 2008-2015, while Southern Europe improved similarly between 2000-2008. In this volume, the authors cover a variety of aforementioned problems and experiences of either all member states, with special attention to peripheral countries, or to sectoral or regional problems in selected countries. The book begins with an overview of the issues of economic convergence and quality of life in all member states. It also addresses political aspects of EU cohesion policy, including involvement of civil society into this public policy, as well as relationships between cohesion policy support and EU identification. The final section discusses an important novelty in the framework of EU cohesion policy, namely the JESSICA initiative, that is, an instrument offering repayable and recyclable funding targeted at economically-viable and sustainable urban development projects. Authors are engaged in research on EU cohesion policy and represent severaldisciplines: economics, political and social sciences.10aCentral and Eastern Europe10acohesion policy10aconvergence10aEU funds10aEuropean Union10aregeneration10aSouthern Europe1 aMusiałkowska, Ida1 aIdczak, Piotr1 aPotluka, Oto  uhttps://www.degruyter.com/view/title/580682?language=en01295nas a2200217   4500008004100000020002200041022002200063245015200085210006900237250003300306260003400339300001200373520052600385653002900911653001000940653000700950653001100957653002000968100002300988856006601011       2018                        eng d  a978-981-10-5921-6  a978-981-10-5920-900aSubnational Development Policy as the Area of Common Interest Under the One Belt, One Road Initiative? The Case of Regional Policy-Making in Poland0 aSubnational Development Policy as the Area of Common Interest Un  aCheng Y., Song L., Huang L.   aSingaporebPalgrave MacMillan  a141-1613 aThis chapter provides an evaluation of the evolution of regional policy-making (at subnational level) in Poland, one of the 28 EU Member States, in the period from just before Poland’s entry into this organization in 2004 to the present. Areas of possible cooperation are discussed, with emphasis on decentralized cooperation and regional policy-making under the new One Belt, One Road strategy. The methods comprise analyses of legal acts, strategic documents, and evaluation reports and our own research in the field.10abelt and road initiative10aChina10aEU10aPoland10aregional policy1 aMusiałkowska, Ida  uhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-5921-6_901967nas a2200205   4500008004100000245013000041210006900171300001200240490000800252520122200260653001101482653002201493653002201515653001501537653002601552653001501578100001801593700002301611856012701634       2012                        eng d00aShaping the priorities of the Polish presidency in the Council of the European Union on the basis of the new presidency model0 aShaping the priorities of the Polish presidency in the Council o  a139-1590 v2193 aIn the second half of the year 2011 Poland held the Presidency of the Council of the European Union. The Lisbon Treaty has introduced a collective 18-month Presidency composed of three previously-designated member states (the “Presidency trio”). This solution should surly contribute to the increase of cohesion and effectiveness of the EU functioning. However the Lisbon Treaty has also modified previous model of the presidency introducing two new offices: the President of the European Council and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. This change resulted in the division of duties between rotating presidency held by “trio” and fixed presidency held by the two new offices. Therefore the aim of this article is to present the new model of the presidency. Furthermore the relevant task of the presidency is to initiate new direction of the EU’s development in the form of a long-term action plan. The proposals of initiatives and top priorities defined in the agenda have a significant influence on the EU functioning and its future challenges especially in time of crises. Thus, the aim of this article is also to analyze the priorities of the Polish Presidency.10aagenda10ahybrid presidency10aPolish Presidency10apresidency10apresidency “trio”10apriorities1 aIdczak, Piotr1 aMusiałkowska, Ida  uhttps://euro.ue.poznan.pl/pl/biblio/shaping-priorities-polish-presidency-council-european-union-basis-new-presidency-model00699nas a2200181   4500008004100000020001800041245006000059210006000119250002200179260008100201300001000282653002500292653003600317653002500353653002000378100002300398856009600421       2005                        eng d  a83-88026-75-500aSynchronizacja regionalnych cykli koniunkturalnych w UE0 aSynchronizacja regionalnych cykli koniunkturalnych w UE  aEwa Małuszyńska  aPoznań, LesznobWyższa Szkoła Marketingu i Zarządzania (WSMiZ) w Lesznie  a33-4910acykle koniunkturalne10aregionalne cykle koniunkturalne10asynchronizacja cykli10aUnia Europejska1 aMusiałkowska, Ida  uhttps://euro.ue.poznan.pl/pl/biblio/synchronizacja-regionalnych-cykli-koniunkturalnych-w-ue