@inbook {4411,
	title = {The origins of the EU Cohesion Policy: from regional economic development to the place-based approach},
	booktitle = {EU Cohesion Policy. A Multidisciplinary Approach},
	year = {2024},
	pages = {10-29},
	abstract = {The overarching objective of the EU Cohesion Policy is to promote the harmonious development of its regions and cities to achieve continuous, coherent, and sustainable development throughout the entire European Union, particularly those less developed. This chapter presents the changes in Cohesion Policy since the mid-1970s, highlighting the shift towards an approach focused on territorial contexts and the endogenous competitive potential of territories. The chapter concentrates on the shift from a traditional policy reducing the socioeconomic disparities between European territories through sectoral interventions to a place-based approach in which policy measures and financial resources are tailored to specific places. This place-based approach aims at bringing policies and activities from different levels of government together. Therefore, policy interventions shifted from being limited to deprived areas to constituting an inherent part of the EU{\textquoteright}s development policies.},
	keywords = {cohesion policy, European Union, Place-based, Territorial development, Territorial dimension},
	doi = {10.4337/9781802209402.00012},
	url = {https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781802209402/book-part-9781802209402-12.xml},
	author = {Piotr Idczak and Ida Musia{\l}kowska and Dagmara Kociuba}
}
@book {4280,
	title = {Successes \& Failures in EU Cohesion Policy: An Introduction to EU cohesion policy in Eastern, Central, and Southern Europe},
	year = {2020},
	pages = {208},
	publisher = {De Gruyter},
	organization = {De Gruyter},
	address = {Berlin/Warsaw},
	abstract = {Regions in the EU{\textquoteright}s Eastern and Southern peripheries tend to perform badly across many rankings from economic development, to quality of government,social justice and innovation potential, despite the fact that the vast majorityof EU structural funding has been spent in these countries. However, these countries followed different development trajectories and reacted differently to the economic crisis. Some of them still struggle, others thrive, others, afteryears of structural transformation, are stuck in a middle-income trap.Successes and failures as a result of EU cohesion implementation are avaluable source of feedback for future plans. Southern part of the EU, and Central and Eastern Europe provide an excellent opportunity to evaluatethem, The whole implementation exercise is sometimes challenging to accomplish, as both the public and private sectors have low absorption capacity. In contrast, positive experiences also emerged. Regions in Central and Eastern European countries witnessed improvements in the form of change in GDP per capita, benchmarked against the EU average during theyears 2008-2015, while Southern Europe improved similarly between 2000-2008. In this volume, the authors cover a variety of aforementioned problems and experiences of either all member states, with special attention to peripheral countries, or to sectoral or regional problems in selected countries. The book begins with an overview of the issues of economic convergence and quality of life in all member states. It also addresses political aspects of EU cohesion policy, including involvement of civil society into this public policy, as well as relationships between cohesion policy support and EU identification. The final section discusses an important novelty in the framework of EU cohesion policy, namely the JESSICA initiative, that is, an instrument offering repayable and recyclable funding targeted at economically-viable and sustainable urban development projects. Authors are engaged in research on EU cohesion policy and represent severaldisciplines: economics, political and social sciences.},
	keywords = {Central and Eastern Europe, cohesion policy, convergence, EU funds, European Union, regeneration, Southern Europe},
	issn = {978-83-957204-4-4},
	doi = {10.1515/9788395720451},
	url = {https://www.degruyter.com/view/title/580682?language=en},
	author = {Ida Musia{\l}kowska and Piotr Idczak and Oto Potluka}
}
@article {627,
	title = {ENLARGEMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION},
	journal = {Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto},
	volume = {50},
	year = {2014},
	month = {06/2014},
	pages = {141-171},
	type = {scientific article},
	chapter = {141},
	abstract = {<p>The European Union (EU) has been transforming and evolving throughout the years of its operating. The two processes of deepening and enlarging have had an impact on each other. Since the very beginning the EU has experienced enlargements but one in particular, in the opinion of many scholars, has influenced the organization the most. The enlargement in 2004 by an additional 10 Member States (initially prepared for 12 members) forced the Union to undertake reforms of its treaties and institutions, including the way of decision-making; it also redirected budgetary transfers and impacted on the functioning of the EU{\textquoteright}s internal market by expanding its geographical scale and increasing the number of enterprises and consumers that joined it; finally, it gave the EU a new political and geopolitical position. The main aim of the article is to analyze the economic development of the Member States (and especially) the new Member States {\textendash} herein after referred to as NMS) of this particular enlargement and the EU. The methods of analyses are based on secondary data analysis and the author{\textquoteright}s own research related to e.g. regional policy-making.</p>},
	keywords = {2004, enlargement, European Union, {\textquotedblleft}new Member States{\textquotedblright}},
	issn = {1130-8354},
	url = {https://www.academia.edu/9217559/Enlargements_of_the_European_Union},
	author = {Ida Musia{\l}kowska}
}
@book {3466,
	title = {Local Participation in Visegrad Countries: How Are Politicians Rooted in the Civil Society?},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {109},
	publisher = {IREAS},
	organization = {IREAS},
	address = {Praga},
	abstract = {<p>This year, the Visegrad countries celebrate together twenty ve years since the socio, economic and political changes lead in collapse of totalitarian regimes. But the political transition brought also problems and new challenges not know previously. The rst free elections were held in the Visegrad countries that time and their inhabitants could choose their political representatives. Many of them came originally from the civil society and revolution movements. However, the political decision-making became disconnected from the civil society over time. We study the present rootedness of local political representatives in the civil society measured by their membership and leadership in civil society organisations in all four Visegrad countries. We are as well interested in engagement of activists from the civil society in an institutionalised political life, i.e. political parties and political movements. The purpose of this book is to discuss development of local democracy, local development initiatives and local social capital in growing urban areas in post-transition countries in which the civil society was almost absent or very weak twenty ve years ago. This publication comes up with overviews of the situation in four cities, one in each of the Visegrad countries. First the Polish case of Poznan is discussed. Then three capital cities follow: Czech Prague, Slovakian Bratislava and Hungarian Budapest.</p>},
	keywords = {Bratislava, Budapest, civil society, civil society organisations, European Union, leaders, local elections, local participation, Poznan, Prague, regions, Visegrad Countries},
	issn = {978-80-86684-98-7},
	url = {http://www.ireas.cz/images/projekty/lea/lea_publikace.pdf},
	author = {Potluka, Oto and Piotr Idczak and Ida Musia{\l}kowska and Kalman, Judit and Spacek, Martin and Kostal, Ctibor and Ovadek, Michal and Tholtova, Barbora}
}
@article {1782,
	title = {Volume 14, Number 3, 2014  Poznan University of Economics Review },
	year = {2014},
	keywords = {commissioners, democratic deficit, European integration, European Union, internal market, law, multilingualism, political and cultural identities, politics, socialization},
	isbn = {1643-5877},
	url = {http://www.puereview.ue.poznan.pl/TocPage.php?Volume=14\&Number=3\&Year=2014},
	author = {Ewa Ma{\l}uszy{\'n}ska and Grzegorz Mazur and Ida Musia{\l}kowska}
}
@article {2880,
	title = {Volume 14, Number 4, 2014 Poznan University of Economics Review},
	year = {2014},
	keywords = {Central Europe, companies, competitiveness, Croatia, enlargement, European integration, European Union, eurozone, export performance, firms, high-tech exports, iVisegrad group, mid-tech, new Member States, public debt, public goods, public policy, sustainability, Western Balkans},
	url = {http://www.puereview.ue.poznan.pl/TocPage.php?Volume=14\&Number=4\&Year=2014},
	author = {Ma{\l}uszy{\'n}ska, Ewa and Grzegorz Mazur and Ida Musia{\l}kowska}
}
@article {433,
	title = {Evolution of Priorities in Higher Education and R\&D in the European Union. Case of Poland },
	journal = {Forum on Public Policy Online},
	volume = {Summer 2008},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {1-20},
	keywords = {European Union, higher education, Poland, research and development},
	url = {http://forumonpublicpolicy.com/summer08papers/archivesummer08/musialkowska.pdf},
	author = {Ida Musia{\l}kowska}
}
no socket