01900nas a2200229   4500000000100000008004100001260001200042653002300054653005000077653002500127653002300152653003800175653001100213100001700224700002200241245012200263856007000385300000700455490000700462024001400469520118700483       2026                            d  c08/202510aJESSICA initiative10asecondary territorial cohesion cities (ScTCC)10aterritorial cohesion10aEU cohesion policy10afinancial engineering instruments10aPoland1 aPiotr Idczak1 aIda Musiałkowska00aContributing to territorial cohesion by EU cohesion policy financial instrument? The JESSICA implementation in Poland  uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09654313.2025.2550988  a240 v34  a1920796543 aThe paper examines the territorial distribution of the JESSICA funding support (Joint European Support for Sustainable Investment in City Areas), a financial engineering instrument of EU Cohesion Policy among Polish cities. It addresses an existing gap in the literature and provides an analysis of a spatial distribution of repayable assistance, which is absent in CP studies. The study i) provides a comprehensive overview of the spatial distribution of the JESSICA funding across cities within particular regions, focusing on smaller cities regarded as secondary territorial cohesion cities (ScTCC) that should play an important role in territorialized development policy; (ii) assesses to what extent the JESSICA projects in SCTCC fit in with spatial-functional arrangements laid down in the regional spatial management plans; (iii) determines factors of the attractiveness of ScTCC as the JESSICA beneficiaries. Results confirm that ScTCC have enough capacities to implement revolving instrument projects, outperformed the capital cities in implementing the JESSICA projects, and are important but under-researched and under-represented actors of the urban and cohesion policy.