@article {4326,
	title = {Spatial Distribution of JESSICA  Funding Across Polish Municipalities. Perspective of Territorial Dimension  of EU Cohesion Policy},
	journal = {Studia Regionalne i Lokalne},
	year = {2021},
	month = {10/2021},
	pages = {7-20},
	chapter = {7},
	abstract = {The JESSICA initiative was set up to provide a more sustainable and efficient response to the needs of urban areas, as compared to non-repayable grants. Anchored in the literature on place-based policy and territorial cohesion, this paper addresses the question how the JESSICA funds were allocated among Polish cities {\textendash} whether, intuitively, only to key urban centres, or to smaller cities as well. The results illustrate that the repayable assistance of JESSICA was dispersed throughout the regions, although the degree of dispersion remains mixed across them. Almost half of the JESSICA funds was transferred to small and medium-sized cities. It was also found that the bulk of the assistance went to the projects that were implemented in cities situated within metropolitan areas of the regional capital cities.},
	keywords = {cities, cohesion policy, JESSICA initiative, Poland, standard deviational ellipse, territorial cohesion},
	doi = {10.7366/1509499538501},
	url = {https://studreg.uw.edu.pl/dane/web_sril_files/1746/2021_3_idczak_mrozik.pdf},
	author = {Piotr Idczak and Karol Mrozik and Ida Musia{\l}kowska}
}
@book {4280,
	title = {Successes \& Failures in EU Cohesion Policy: An Introduction to EU cohesion policy in Eastern, Central, and Southern Europe},
	year = {2020},
	pages = {208},
	publisher = {De Gruyter},
	organization = {De Gruyter},
	address = {Berlin/Warsaw},
	abstract = {Regions in the EU{\textquoteright}s Eastern and Southern peripheries tend to perform badly across many rankings from economic development, to quality of government,social justice and innovation potential, despite the fact that the vast majorityof EU structural funding has been spent in these countries. However, these countries followed different development trajectories and reacted differently to the economic crisis. Some of them still struggle, others thrive, others, afteryears of structural transformation, are stuck in a middle-income trap.Successes and failures as a result of EU cohesion implementation are avaluable source of feedback for future plans. Southern part of the EU, and Central and Eastern Europe provide an excellent opportunity to evaluatethem, The whole implementation exercise is sometimes challenging to accomplish, as both the public and private sectors have low absorption capacity. In contrast, positive experiences also emerged. Regions in Central and Eastern European countries witnessed improvements in the form of change in GDP per capita, benchmarked against the EU average during theyears 2008-2015, while Southern Europe improved similarly between 2000-2008. In this volume, the authors cover a variety of aforementioned problems and experiences of either all member states, with special attention to peripheral countries, or to sectoral or regional problems in selected countries. The book begins with an overview of the issues of economic convergence and quality of life in all member states. It also addresses political aspects of EU cohesion policy, including involvement of civil society into this public policy, as well as relationships between cohesion policy support and EU identification. The final section discusses an important novelty in the framework of EU cohesion policy, namely the JESSICA initiative, that is, an instrument offering repayable and recyclable funding targeted at economically-viable and sustainable urban development projects. Authors are engaged in research on EU cohesion policy and represent severaldisciplines: economics, political and social sciences.},
	keywords = {Central and Eastern Europe, cohesion policy, convergence, EU funds, European Union, regeneration, Southern Europe},
	issn = {978-83-957204-4-4},
	doi = {10.1515/9788395720451},
	url = {https://www.degruyter.com/view/title/580682?language=en},
	author = {Ida Musia{\l}kowska and Piotr Idczak and Oto Potluka}
}
@inbook {4015,
	title = {Subnational Development Policy as the Area of Common Interest Under the One Belt, One Road Initiative? The Case of Regional Policy-Making in Poland},
	booktitle = {The Belt \& Road Initiative in the Global Arena.},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {141-161},
	publisher = {Palgrave MacMillan},
	organization = {Palgrave MacMillan},
	edition = {Cheng Y., Song L., Huang L. },
	address = {Singapore},
	abstract = {This chapter provides an evaluation of the evolution of regional policy-making (at subnational level) in Poland, one of the 28 EU Member States, in the period from just before Poland{\textquoteright}s entry into this organization in 2004 to the present. Areas of possible cooperation are discussed, with emphasis on decentralized cooperation and regional policy-making under the new One Belt, One Road strategy. The methods comprise analyses of legal acts, strategic documents, and evaluation reports and our own research in the field.},
	keywords = {belt and road initiative, China, EU, Poland, regional policy},
	isbn = {978-981-10-5921-6},
	issn = {978-981-10-5920-9},
	doi = {10.1007/978-981-10-5921-6_9},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-5921-6_9},
	author = {Ida Musia{\l}kowska}
}
@article {Idczak2012a,
	title = {Shaping the priorities of the Polish presidency in the Council of the European Union on the basis of the new presidency model},
	journal = {Modern World Economy. Micro- and Macroeconomic Issues. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu},
	volume = {219},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {139-159},
	abstract = {In the second half of the year 2011 Poland held the Presidency of the Council of the European Union. The Lisbon Treaty has introduced a collective 18-month Presidency composed of three previously-designated member states (the {\textquotedblleft}Presidency trio{\textquotedblright}). This solution should surly contribute to the increase of cohesion and effectiveness of the EU functioning. However the Lisbon Treaty has also modified previous model of the presidency introducing two new offices: the President of the European Council and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. This change resulted in the division of duties between rotating presidency held by {\textquotedblleft}trio{\textquotedblright} and fixed presidency held by the two new offices. Therefore the aim of this article is to present the new model of the presidency. Furthermore the relevant task of the presidency is to initiate new direction of the EU{\textquoteright}s development in the form of a long-term action plan. The proposals of initiatives and top priorities defined in the agenda have a significant influence on the EU functioning and its future challenges especially in time of crises. Thus, the aim of this article is also to analyze the priorities of the Polish Presidency.},
	keywords = {agenda, hybrid presidency, Polish Presidency, presidency, presidency {\textquotedblleft}trio{\textquotedblright}, priorities},
	author = {Piotr Idczak and Ida Musia{\l}kowska}
}
@inbook {432,
	title = {Synchronizacja regionalnych cykli koniunkturalnych w UE},
	booktitle = {Regiony w procesie integracji europejskiej},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {33-49},
	publisher = {Wy{\.z}sza Szko{\l}a Marketingu i Zarz{\k a}dzania (WSMiZ) w Lesznie},
	organization = {Wy{\.z}sza Szko{\l}a Marketingu i Zarz{\k a}dzania (WSMiZ) w Lesznie},
	edition = {Ewa Ma{\l}uszy{\'n}ska},
	address = {Pozna{\'n}, Leszno},
	keywords = {cykle koniunkturalne, regionalne cykle koniunkturalne, synchronizacja cykli, Unia Europejska},
	isbn = {83-88026-75-5},
	author = {Ida Musia{\l}kowska}
}
